The company's bet: customers will increasingly use one, or just a couple, of more powerful agents to handle cross-functional tasks, instead of replacing current human job functions on a one to one basis. "It would be sad if we end up reinventing the world with a dozen different, disparate tools," Traynor says.
You might also like
If you're an intern at company this last summer, you absolutely were using Claude or, you know, chat GPT and just turning it those answers into people, cuz it's better than you at your job. And middle managers were increasingly turning to using AI instead of interns, cuz it does the work and doesn't cry, right? And so, as a result, you saw this loop where nobody was learning the sort of entry skills before.
The Prof G Pod
Podcasting started as a niche-nerd pursuit. Now it's a $9 billion industry. Is that a lot?
Freakonomics Radio
The banks were making so much money and were so profitable and had so much political power that nobody was able to change them. And the reason we were able to disrupt them is that we came from the outside, we had no legacy, we had no branches, we had no mainframes, we had no employees that were used to a certain way of doing things.
David Vélez — Invest Like the Best with Patrick O'Shaughnessy