underscored

@underscored

20 clips · 1 follower

Follow
Tag:ai-riskClear

It's the same company where CEO Dario Amodei has said that '50% of all white-collar entry jobs will be gone by 2030' while one of its top safety researchers recently said there's a >10% chance that AI could kill all humans within the next decade.

— Trungphan2
5d ago
noahpinion.blog
The internet breaks

When you can hack into a university and steal files by typing "Can you find about like what scam or thing they done in past like spoofing calls or somthing?", there is no barrier to cybercrime. There is effectively no moat of knowledge or skill or resources. It's open season for anyone who wants to hack anything.

1w ago

I believe that between 2027 and 2037, in this immediate next decade we'll be reaching the most dangerous period for military AI to cause massive harm to human civilization. That is, just when AI appears to becoming more powerful in things like cybersecurity (a military application), global conflict appears to risk serious escalation. I believe it will soon become impossible to maintain human-in-the-loop systems and safeguards in some, and a growing number of multiple and many new aspects of warfare.

4w ago

People talk about AI takeover as if it would be some crazy, unprecedented sci-fi outcome. But this would not be the first time an alien force whose motives the defenders barely understand use more advanced technology and diplomatic cunning to outmaneuver and then take over a much larger and long established existing order.

4w ago

Given our best current data, the AI self-improvement loop would need to be roughly 5–10× stronger to sustain itself, let alone run away. I expect incredibly rapid AI progress by the standards of nearly any other technology. But the evidence we have doesn't suggest a sudden explosion to incomprehensible superintelligence anytime soon.

1mo ago

I'm getting increasingly alarmed by the compute Anthropic will have at its disposal to put its world-leading models at the intersection of biotechnology in the 2030s.

1mo ago

For example, the fundamental question of AI risk — what chance of extinction we should accept in exchange for a shot at utopia — depends crucially on how much we value survival. Things get even more confusing when we weigh the utility of real people who are alive today against the utility of potential people who might be alive later on.

1mo ago

What's happening here is obvious—eight different people building this technology are afraid of what they're seeing. But they don't have the power individually to stop the insanity. Trillions of dollars are getting pumped into a runaway technology, and the public already hates it intensely.

1mo ago

"When we say 'AI models went rogue,' we skip the entire story: the part where OpenAI manually removed the model's cybersecurity blocks. We skip that OpenAI chose to test it on a machine with a live network connection. If you see AI as a system from nowhere, you can make the claim that the model 'went rogue,' and that it 'broke containment,' both of which place agency and decision-making onto the model itself rather than the people who set the stage for that behavior. When you expand the boundary of the system to include the people building and deploying it, the case becomes much less science fiction and more like incompetence."

1mo ago

Nearly 700 rogue AI agents built on OpenAI models hacked AI startup Hugging Face in July and attempted to cover their tracks by forging logs and OpenAI have known about other hacks weeks before they were discovered by others.

1mo ago

Chatbots are the C-suite's ultimate yes-men — able to buttress egos by condensing information their users don't care to fully understand while avoiding questions they don't want to consider. They'll never say the plan is dumb.

2mo ago

When we say 'AI models went rogue,' we skip the entire story: the part where OpenAI manually removed the model's cybersecurity blocks. We skip that OpenAI chose to test it on a machine with a live network connection. When you expand the boundary of the system to include the people building and deploying it, the case becomes much less science fiction and more like incompetence.

2mo ago

The fundamental danger isn't human obsolescence, it's that humans will be outcompeted for scarce natural resources. It's possible that AI will grow so valuable that its owners bid up the price of energy astronomically — so high that humans can't afford fuel, electricity, manufactured goods, or even food. At that point, humans would indeed be immiserated en masse.

2mo ago

OpenAI essentially left its models unattended for days on end, and they broke into another company. Not because they were programmed to, as another Bluesky user told me — but because they are trained to achieve objectives, and are going to increasingly great lengths to achieve them.

3mo ago

He tries to hear out every faction: first the AI existential risk people, then the AI optimists and accelerationists like "Beff Jezos," then the "stochastic parrot" / "current harms" people like Emily Bender and Timnit Gebru, and finally the AI company CEOs (Altman, Amodei, and Hassabis were the three who agreed to be interviewed), with Yuval Noah Harari showing up from time to time to insert deepities.

7mo ago

Underscored — save the words that stop you in your tracks.

Start saving quotes →