A stock is not just a ticker symbol or an electronic blip; it is an ownership interest in an actual business, with an underlying value that does not depend on its share price. The market is there to serve you, not to instruct you.
1d ago
The chains of habit are too light to be felt until they are too heavy to be broken. Most investors underestimate how much their early portfolio habits — the things they barely notice doing — compound into the architecture of their entire financial life.
A stock is not just a ticker symbol or an electronic blip; it is an ownership interest in an actual business, with an underlying value that does not depend on its share price. The market is there to serve you, not to instruct you.
Most people think of risk as the probability of losing money. But the real risk is that you'll be forced to sell at the wrong time — that circumstances, not judgment, will determine your outcome. Volatility is only dangerous if it can compel you to act.

Fourteen layers of advice from fourteen years of watching where the bodies are buried, from the founder of Skift.
The best investment you can make is in businesses you understand, and the second-best is in your own ability to understand more businesses. Most investors do neither — they buy what's rising and call it research.
Mimicking the herd invites regression to the mean. You will never produce a superior performance unless you do something different from the majority — and that is harder than it sounds, because the majority is usually wrong about enough things to be dangerous, but right about enough things to be seductive.
Invert, always invert. Many hard problems are best solved when you turn them around in reverse. It is not enough to think about what you want — think equally hard about what you want to avoid, and you will find that removing stupidity is often more valuable than adding brilliance.
The man who is perpetually hesitating which of two things he will do first, will do neither. The man who resolves, but does not execute his resolution, has not yet learned to think.
Risk means more things can happen than will happen. The practical definition of risk is not volatility or a standard deviation — it's the possibility of permanent loss of capital. Volatility is opportunity dressed in frightening clothes.
The record of a money manager who merely stays close to the market is not an outstanding record—it is a record of someone who has successfully rationalized doing nothing. The question is not whether you beat the market, but whether you had the intellectual honesty to know when you had no edge and the discipline to act accordingly.
To be in hell is to drift; to be in heaven is to steer.

Why I think we've hit an intelligence overhang and what that means for which model variables actually matter now
A thought which does not result in an action is nothing much, and an action which does not proceed from a thought is nothing at all.
The market for something to believe in is infinite. But the market for something that actually works is much smaller, and far more competitive. Most investors confuse the two.
Most turnaround stories are told years later, by the winner, after the ending is already known. That's why they always sound clean and polished. This one doesn't have an ending yet, and it's anything but clean and polished.
Investors often make the mistake of confusing a exciting industry with a profitable one. The trick is not to find industries that are growing fast, but to find companies that can keep competitors from eating their lunch.
The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt.
Most people overestimate what they can do in one year and underestimate what they can do in ten years. But the subtler error is assuming the next ten years will look like the last ten — the truly dangerous assumption for any investor or builder.
The best thing a human being can do is to help another human being know more. But most people, when they find something that works, hoard it. The great failure of capitalism is that the more valuable a piece of knowledge, the more people are incentivized to hide it.

Good criminals engage with the present in a way major studios do not; they're constantly experimenting with novel technology, and they love to exploit emergent systems. It also gives me a good temp check on what I should actually be worried about in the endless deluge of things I could be worried about, and what's just a nothingburger.
You don't need to recover what you've spent. You need to decide whether the future costs are worth the future benefits, completely independent of the past. The sunk cost fallacy is just the inability to make that distinction.
Leverage is the difference between outcomes in a world that looks similar on the surface. Two investors can have the same insight, the same conviction, and the same patience — but the one who sized correctly will retire while the other merely survives. Position sizing is not a detail; it is the strategy.
The single greatest edge an investor can have is a long-term orientation that other investors are structurally unable to match. Most investors are forced by their mandates, their clients, or their own psychology to think in quarters. If you can genuinely think in decades, you are not playing the same game they are.

Composed players aren't actually perceiving time more slowly than those around them. Their brains are just better at predicting what comes next, so they're preparing their next move while everyone else is still processing the current one. The stillness is a byproduct. The speed was spent earlier, in the reading rather than running.

"It was obvious to us that 10,000 other people were going to go do the content thing," he says. For Ghetti, those "flashiest" uses missed the most important questions: how could we use technology to truly understand our own digital footprint, our own precious data? More importantly: if we got there, how would we control those treasure troves, so that we weren't putting the big AI labs like OpenAI in charge of our own "personal worlds"?
The record of a man who makes consistently good decisions in complex situations is almost always a record of a man who has reduced the number of decisions he has to make. The more choices you face, the more your judgment degrades.
It is not enough to have a good mind; the main thing is to use it well. And the greatest minds are capable of the greatest vices as well as the greatest virtues.

Time is not a resource we have for cashing in. True timefulness … is to live in awareness of the dynamic and unpredictable array of times that co-exist within one life, as well as the intersubjective nature of time between all individuals. To live it well, we may need to break the temporal norms altogether and finally come to terms with time as entirely relational and contingent upon each other in specific and localised ways.
The chains of habit are too light to be felt until they are too heavy to be broken. A young person who consistently saves a small amount will find, decades later, that the habit has built a fortress; a young person who defers saving will find the habit of spending has built a prison.
Mimicking the herd invites regression to the mean. You will never produce a superior investment record by buying what everybody else is buying. The decisions that look best in retrospect are often the ones that felt most uncomfortable at the time.

Two years later, when Thomas's name was in the news, Walkner came back to the post and answered his question: "Why did we turn around just before the summit? Because turning back when conditions become too dangerous is what distinguishes good and experienced alpinists."
The stock market is filled with individuals who know the price of everything, but the value of nothing. The secret to investing is to figure out the value of something — and then pay a lot less for it.

My big takeaway is that both Sol & Fable represent jumps over previous models and have opened a large gap with the next-best AIs. People will have preferences for one or the other, but if you [are] doing any work where better intelligence matters, those two models are your only choices.
The best investors I know have a strong view about the future, but they hold it loosely — they're always looking for evidence that they're wrong. Conviction without flexibility is just stubbornness dressed up as confidence.
The market is a device for transferring money from the impatient to the patient. But patience isn't passive — it requires the psychological discipline to do nothing when everything in you screams to act.
The biggest constraint on the returns of a large investor is the investor himself. Most people think they need more information, better models, faster data. But the actual binding constraint is almost always temperament — the ability to hold a variant view, in size, for a long time, while being wrong in ways that are publicly visible.
The biggest risk isn't that you'll lose money — it's that you'll succeed, and then make a bigger, more confident bet on something you don't actually understand as well as you think you do.
Diversification is a protection against ignorance. It makes very little sense for those who know what they're doing.
It is a truth very certain that, when it is not in our power to determine what is true, we ought to follow what is most probable; and even if we cannot discover which of the alternatives is the more probable, we must nevertheless choose one of them.
The funnel of opportunity is wider than most people think, but the filter of execution is far narrower than most people realize. Ideas are not the scarce resource; disciplined follow-through on a single idea, long past the point of comfort, is what almost no one can sustain.
The ability to destroy your ideas rapidly instead of slowly when the occasion is right is one of the most valuable things you can have. You have to work hard on it. Ask yourself what are the arguments on the other side. It's painful, but it works wonders.
It is not the going out of port, but the coming in, that determines the success of a voyage.

Most 'make AI go well' interventions are insurance against bad outcomes, especially tail risks. My meta-level argument is that the best way of converting money into impact is to identify interventions that have the property of paying off big in both worlds: by producing step-changes in welfare in the everyday world as well as significantly reducing tail-risks in the emergency world.

Our experiment involves 1,500 participants in 30 decision environments spanning core domains in economics and the social sciences…[W]e find that AI advice depolarizes choices on average, moving participants away from their initial leanings. This depolarization arises despite the LLM being measurably sycophantic: it disproportionately offers considerations that support users' initial leanings and uses agreeable and flattering language.
Invert, always invert. Many hard problems are best solved when you turn them around in reverse. It is not enough to think about what you want to achieve — ask yourself what would guarantee failure, then avoid it.

We are very bad at feeling exponentials from the inside, and we are currently inside one. AI is not capable of being a real cybersecurity threat until suddenly it is, causing sudden and improvised policy changes at the highest level of government. Markets discount whether AI might threaten to undermine a business model until suddenly it can, leading to massive swings in stocks.

I combined human vibe scoring (70%) with LLM as judge scoring (30%) instead of trusting either alone

Not every task, workflow, or company demands that you move up to the highest rung to get the most out of AI. The right rung on each ladder is about the best use of AI for the work in front of you.
Risk means more things can happen than will happen. The job of a good investor isn't to predict which one occurs — it's to ensure you survive the ones you didn't predict.
We know accurately only when we know little; with knowledge doubt increases.
Underscored — save the words that stop you in your tracks.
Start saving quotes →