underscoredpodcasts

@underscoredpodcasts

18 clips · 1 follower

Follow
Tag:transformersClear

The thing that I find most exciting is that transformers have essentially won. We know that this is the architecture. And if you know that, then you can build a chip that only runs transformers, and you can get massive efficiency gains by doing that, because you're not building a general purpose chip.

Invest Like the Best with Patrick O'Shaughnessy
12h ago

The thing that's really interesting about transformers specifically is that it's not obvious that the architecture is going to change. Usually in the history of chip design, you build a chip for a specific algorithm and then the algorithm changes and your chip is worthless. But transformers have been around for seven years and they've just gotten bigger and bigger and more and more capable, and there's no real sign that they're going to go away.

2d ago

The thing that's so special about transformers is they can be trained end to end with gradient descent. You don't have to come up with the algorithm yourself. You just show the network examples of inputs and outputs and it figures out the algorithm. And because the algorithm is learned rather than programmed, it can be much more sophisticated than anything a human could come up with.

3d ago

The thing that's special about transformers specifically is that the weights are so large that you can't fit them all on chip. And so what happens is that you spend most of your time just loading weights from memory rather than doing computation. And so the key insight behind Etched is that if you hardcode the transformer architecture into silicon, you can do a lot of tricks to basically never have to load the weights from memory.

4d ago

The core insight is that transformers have a fixed architecture, and if that architecture is going to be with us for a long time, there's a massive opportunity to build a chip that does nothing but run transformers — and does it faster and cheaper than anything else. A general-purpose chip has to be flexible, and flexibility costs you in efficiency.

4d ago

The thing that's really interesting about transformers is that they've kind of eaten AI. So many of the workloads that people care about are transformers. And because the transformer is a fixed algorithm, you can etch it into silicon — you can build a chip that only runs transformers, and it will be orders of magnitude faster and cheaper than a chip that can run any algorithm.

5d ago

The core insight is that transformers have a fixed computational pattern — and if you etch that pattern directly into silicon rather than running it on general-purpose hardware, you eliminate the overhead that makes inference slow and expensive. A chip that can only run transformers is dramatically faster and cheaper at running transformers than a chip designed to run anything.

6d ago

The key insight is that transformers, which underpin all modern AI, have a fixed mathematical structure — and if you build a chip that does nothing but transformers, you can eliminate the overhead that makes GPUs so inefficient at inference. A transformer supercomputer, etched in silicon, could be 10 to 20 times faster and cheaper than the GPU alternative.

1w ago

The thing that I find most stunning about this is that transformers were invented in 2017, and the reason that they've taken over everything is that they're extremely good at using parallel compute. And so the question is, are transformers the last great neural network architecture? And our bet is yes, or at least that they will be dominant for the foreseeable future, which means that if you build a chip that is perfect for transformers, you will have a chip that is perfect for AI.

1w ago

The thing that's special about transformers specifically is that you can make an ASIC, an application specific integrated circuit, specifically for transformers, and that chip will be so much faster and cheaper than a GPU at running transformers that it's almost incomprehensible. GPUs are a general-purpose chip that has to do everything, whereas an ASIC can be laser-focused on one task.

1w ago

The thing that's interesting about transformers specifically is that you have this operation called attention, which requires you to look at all of the previous tokens every single time you generate a new token. So if you have a very long context, meaning a very long conversation or document, you have to do an enormous amount of memory reads every single time you want to generate even one new word. And that's actually a really hard problem.

1w ago

The thing that's really interesting about transformers is that the attention mechanism, which is the key innovation, is actually a fixed algorithm. It's not like the weights change the algorithm; the weights just parameterize the algorithm. And so if you know that the algorithm is fixed, you can build hardware that's specifically designed to run that algorithm as fast as possible.

1w ago

The thing that's special about transformers is the attention mechanism, and the attention mechanism has this property that every single token has to interact with every other token. The amount of computation required scales with the square of the sequence length. So as you try to process longer and longer contexts, it gets quadratically more expensive.

1w ago

The core insight is that transformers are actually very predictable in their memory access patterns — you know exactly what weights you're going to need before you need them. And so if you build a chip that's specifically designed around that access pattern, you can be much more efficient than a general-purpose chip that has to handle arbitrary memory access patterns.

1w ago

Underscored — save the words that stop you in your tracks.

Start saving quotes →